I enjoyed the talk and have been musing about how to understand whether what is posted, in the great new order, is good or bad (I don't believe that all information is good information - some of it is downright noise). There could still be a place for a 'paper', as a consolidation and bringing together of material previously released, at which point ticks and likes can be used to guage the worth. How do we decide whether the folk doing the ticking have any serious credentials?