Well Cameron I get what you are saying and I am fine with not using the word stealing but I am not sure I agree with some of your positions on this. In particular, I think how something is used is important in these types of cases since this material was not placed in the public domain with no restrictions. For example, if someone were to take this logo and use it for a tattoo, I do not think anyone would complain even if it was not attributed. But taking it for one's company logo, with neither permission nor attribution, is more of a problem. It is specifically more of a problem because of how it was used. Now, if something was in the public domain, and completely open, then the freedom of speech analogy works. But for non public domain material, how something is used is important.