looking back on academic journal review processes, so, what's your take on this example?

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
"It is a two-stage process involving the scientific discussion forum , and it has been designed to use the full potential of the internet to foster scientific discussion and enable rapid publication of scientific papers." http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/review/index.html

and, same url:
"Upon internet publication the paper is opened for Interactive Public Discussion during which Referee Comments (anonymous or attributed), Author Comments (on behalf of all co-authors), and Short Comments by any registered member of the scientific community (attributed) are published alongside the discussion paper"
Chart 1: