<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friendfeed for Research? First impressions of ScienceFeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/</link>
	<description>The online home of Cameron Neylon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/comment-page-2/#comment-4083</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronneylon.net/?p=815#comment-4083</guid>
		<description>Florian, &lt;br&gt;Where I find a big difference from facebook, and use in scientific discussion, is that highly discussed topics float to the top of the feed and repeat, even when you are not directly involved (unlike facebook where you need to interact with a comment first).  In addition, the &#039;like&#039; mechanism acts more like a &#039;save for later&#039; mechanism as you can search a list of your likes (so I use it to bookmark stuff, rather than necessarily &#039;liking&#039; it per se).  These are both things I find have an advantage when discussing science, and that I sometimes miss when interacting socially on FB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florian, <br />Where I find a big difference from facebook, and use in scientific discussion, is that highly discussed topics float to the top of the feed and repeat, even when you are not directly involved (unlike facebook where you need to interact with a comment first).  In addition, the &#39;like&#39; mechanism acts more like a &#39;save for later&#39; mechanism as you can search a list of your likes (so I use it to bookmark stuff, rather than necessarily &#39;liking&#39; it per se).  These are both things I find have an advantage when discussing science, and that I sometimes miss when interacting socially on FB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/comment-page-2/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronneylon.net/?p=815#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/2008/03/14/friendfeed-is-this-years-twitter-but-why/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://techcrunch.com/2008/03/14/friendfeed-is-...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/03/14/friendfeed-is-this-years-twitter-but-why/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2008/03/14/friendfeed-is-&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/comment-page-2/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronneylon.net/?p=815#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>OK, I missed out on the aggregation a litte. But still I can discuss &quot;objects&quot; on Facebook just as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I missed out on the aggregation a litte. But still I can discuss &#8220;objects&#8221; on Facebook just as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/comment-page-2/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronneylon.net/?p=815#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>I seriously do not get the point of FriendFeed (and ScienceFeed neither). I&#039;ve had a glance over it now and I wonder what it can do that Facebook can&#039;t...?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Answers will be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously do not get the point of FriendFeed (and ScienceFeed neither). I&#39;ve had a glance over it now and I wonder what it can do that Facebook can&#39;t&#8230;?</p>
<p>Answers will be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hydrogeologist@work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Science 2.0</title>
		<link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/comment-page-2/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>Hydrogeologist@work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Science 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronneylon.net/?p=815#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>[...] http://friendfeed.com/science-2-0 http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://friendfeed.com/science-2-0" rel="nofollow">http://friendfeed.com/science-2-0</a> <a href="http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/" rel="nofollow">http://cameronneylon.net/blog/friendfeed-for-research-first-impressions-of-sciencefeed/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.915 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-13 13:24:03 -->

